Al Hamra Trading Est. . v. Diamondback Tactical, LLLP et al
Filing
103
AMENDED JUDGMENT in favor of Al Hamra Trading Est. against D-Back Acquisition Co., Diamondback Tactical, LLLP jointly and severally in the amount of $500.00 in full satisfaction of all claims alleged by Plaintiff against these Defendants. Defendants' Amended Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Daniel Walsh, Karen Herman and First Choice Armor and Equipment, Inc. are DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/14/2014. (nv)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00373-MR-DLH
AL HAMRA TRADING, EST.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
DIAMONDBACK TACTICAL, LLLP;
)
D-BACK ACQUISITION CO.; FIRST
)
CHOICE ARMOR AND EQUIPMENT, )
INC.; KAREN HERMAN; and DANIEL )
WALSH,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
AMENDED JUDGMENT
FOR THE REASONS set forth in the Memorandum of Decision and
Order filed contemporaneously herewith, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED
ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ Amended Motion for
Summary Judgment is GRANTED; the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants
Daniel Walsh and Karen Herman are hereby DISMISSED; and the
Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendant First Choice Armor and Equipment,
Inc. are DISMISSED.
Further, pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Plaintiff against Defendants
Diamondback Tactical, LLLP and D-Back Acquisition Co. jointly and
severally in the amount of $500.00 in full satisfaction of all claims alleged
by Plaintiff against these Defendants.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?