Taylor v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER denying 22 Motion to Approve Allocation of Settlement Funds. It is further ordered that the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal within fourteen days. If no such stipulation is filed, the Court will dismiss this action on its own motion. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/20/2015. (nv)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00056-MR-DLH RICHARD ERIC TAYLOR, Individually ) and as Personal Representative of ) the Estate of DIANNE GRUBB ) TAYLOR, Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Approve Allocation of Settlement Funds [Doc. 22]. The Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an Order approving the allocation of settlement funds in this matter. [Doc. 22]. The Plaintiff’s motion is not accompanied by a brief as required by the Local Rules. See LCvR 7.1(C). On that basis alone, the Plaintiff’s motion should be denied. Reaching the merits of the Plaintiff’s motion, however, the Court must deny the motion. The Plaintiff cites no legal authority which allows for the requested relief. North Carolina law generally does not require the approval of settlements where the recipients are competent adults. Moreover, the allocation of amounts recovered in a wrongful death action is dictated by statute. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 28A-18-2. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Approve Allocation of Settlement Funds [Doc. 22] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal of this action within fourteen (14) days. If no such stipulation is filed, the Court will dismiss this action on its own motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: March 20, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?