Davis v. Scope Services

Filing 18

ORDER that Deft's 15 Report on Selection of Mediator and Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge (#15), being considered as a motion, is ALLOWED and Clifford C. Marshall, Jr. is named as the mediator in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 8/20/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:13 CV 58 SONYA DAVIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff v SCOPE SERVICES, Defendant ORDER THIS MATTER has come before the undersigned pursuant to Defendant’s Report on Selection of Mediator and Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge (#15) and pursuant to the Court’s Order (#16) setting a status conference for August 9, 2013. At the call of the status conference on August 9, 2013, the Plaintiff did not appear. Defendant was present and represented through James M. Dedman, IV. From the Defendant’s report (#15) it appears that Defendant’s counsel has attempted to try to discuss the selection of a mediator in this matter with Plaintiff and Plaintiff will not respond to efforts made by Defendant’s counsel to contact her. Defendant has proposed that attorney Clifford C. Marshall, Jr. of Marshall, Roth & Gregory be selected to serve as mediator in this matter. The Court is familiar with Mr. Marshall, who is an 1 excellent attorney and mediator and finds that he would be a fit and suitable mediator to preside over the mediation in this matter. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant’s Report on Selection of Mediator and Joint Stipulation of Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by United States Magistrate Judge (#15), being considered as a motion, will be ALLOWED and Clifford C. Marshall, Jr. be named as the mediator in this matter. Signed: August 20, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?