Pressley et al v. Bird Brain, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER denying as premature 17 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 05/30/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw) (Main Document 18 replaced on 5/30/2013) (emw). NEF regenerated.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00060-MR-DLH
SANDRA PRESSLEY and DEAN
PRESSLEY,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
BIRD BRAIN, INC. and WAL-MART
)
STORES EAST, LP,
)
)
Defendants,
)
and
)
)
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP,
)
)
Third Party Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
SUSIE W. GIBSON, a/k/a Vivian Y.
)
Gibson,
)
)
Third Party Defendant.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry
of Default Judgment against Bird Brain, Inc. [Doc. 17].
The Plaintiffs move pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure for the entry of a default judgment against the Defendant
Bird Brain, Inc. [Doc. 17]. The Plaintiffs, however, have not yet moved for
the entry of a default against this Defendant. In order to obtain a default
judgment, the Plaintiffs must first seek an entry of default pursuant to Rule
55(a).
Once the Clerk of Court has entered a default against the
Defendant, the Plaintiffs may then seek the entry of a default judgment.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Accordingly, the Plaintiffs’ motion for the entry of
a default judgment is premature.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of
Default Judgment against Bird Brain, Inc. [Doc. 17] is DENIED as
premature.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: May 30, 2013
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?