Brown v. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER granting Pltf's 25 Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees under Sec. 406(b). Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 12/11/2017. (ejb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:13-cv-96
CHARLES BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner Of
Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Order
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s
Fees. (Doc. No. 25).
Under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), whenever a claimant receives a favorable judgment to a
claimant represented by an attorney, the court may “allow as part of its judgment a reasonable
fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to
which the claimant is entitled.” Counsel for Plaintiff has shown that she has expended 68.5
hours on Plaintiff’s case and requests a fee of $14,780.50 from the Commissioner, which is less
than 25 percent of the past-due benefits to which Plaintiff is entitled. The Commissioner has not
opposed this Motion and has previously indicated to Plaintiff that it does not believe this fee
would result in a windfall to Plaintiff’s counsel.
Upon receipt of the § 406(b) fee, Plaintiff’s counsel will reimburse Plaintiff the EAJA fee
of $11,886.25 that was previously ordered by this Court. (Doc. No. 21)
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security pay to Plaintiff’s
counsel the sum of $14,780.50 from Plaintiff’s back benefits and Plaintiff’s counsel pay to
Plaintiff $11,886.25. Upon the payment of such sums this case is dismissed with prejudice.
Signed: December 11, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?