Capital Bank, N.A. v. Bright's Creek Lot 71, LLC et al
Filing
50
ORDER that within fourteen days of the entry of this Order, the parties shall pay to the Court the amount of $1,882.24 in jury costs. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/3/2014. (nv)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00146-MR-DLH
CAPITAL BANK, N.A.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
BRIGHT’S CREEK LOT 71, LLC
)
and SAMUEL LANCELOTTA,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
This matter was scheduled for trial on September 23, 2014. On the
morning of trial, but prior to the commencement of jury selection, the
parties announced to the Court that they had reached a settlement. The
Court incurred a total of $1,882.24 in costs in assembling the jury for the
trial.
The Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan previously entered in
this case provides as follows:
Whenever a civil action scheduled for a jury trial is
settled or otherwise disposed of in advance of the
actual trial, the Court may assess all jurors’ costs,
including Marshal’s fees, mileage reimbursement,
and per diem fees, equally against the parties or
otherwise may determine appropriate assessments
unless the Clerk’s Office is notified by 4:00 p.m. of
the business day immediately preceding the Trial or
the parties otherwise establish good cause why the
Court should not assess jury costs against the
parties.
[Doc. 8 at 11-12].
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that within fourteen
(14) days of the entry of this Order, the parties shall pay to the Court the
amount of $1,882.24 in jury costs or otherwise establish in writing good
cause why the Court should not assess such costs against the parties in
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?