Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County et al

Filing 124

ORDER granting 118 Motion for Permission to File Four Consolidated Responses to Defts' Eight Motions for Summary Judgment. (See Order for further details.) Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 6/16/15. (ejb)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00224-MR-DSC ROBERT WILCOXSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BUNCOMBE COUNTY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Permission to File Four Consolidated Responses to Defendants’ Eight Motions for Summary Judgment [Doc. 118]. The Defendants consent to the Plaintiff’s Motion. For the reasons stated in the Plaintiff’s Motion, and for cause shown, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion [Doc. 118] is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff shall be permitted to file four consolidated responses to the Defendants’ summary judgment motions and to increase the page limit for two of those four consolidated responses as follows: (1) One brief, not to exceed fifty (50) pages, addressing Counts I and II. (2) One brief, not to exceed thirty-five (35) pages, addressing Counts III and IV. (3) One brief, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, addressing the various arguments made by Buncombe County with respect to Count V and the various arguments made on behalf of Defendant Medford in his official capacity. (4) One brief, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, addressing the Defendants’ arguments regarding intervening causes and qualified immunity. (5) All briefs shall be double spaced and in at least 14 point font. IT IS SO ORDERED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?