Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County et al
Filing
124
ORDER granting 118 Motion for Permission to File Four Consolidated Responses to Defts' Eight Motions for Summary Judgment. (See Order for further details.) Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 6/16/15. (ejb)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00224-MR-DSC
ROBERT WILCOXSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BUNCOMBE COUNTY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for
Permission to File Four Consolidated Responses to Defendants’ Eight
Motions for Summary Judgment [Doc. 118]. The Defendants consent to the
Plaintiff’s Motion.
For the reasons stated in the Plaintiff’s Motion, and for cause shown,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion [Doc. 118]
is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff shall be permitted to file four consolidated
responses to the Defendants’ summary judgment motions and to increase
the page limit for two of those four consolidated responses as follows:
(1)
One brief, not to exceed fifty (50) pages, addressing
Counts I and II.
(2)
One brief, not to exceed thirty-five (35) pages, addressing
Counts III and IV.
(3)
One brief, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, addressing
the various arguments made by Buncombe County with
respect to Count V and the various arguments made on
behalf of Defendant Medford in his official capacity.
(4)
One brief, not to exceed twenty-five (25) pages, addressing
the Defendants’ arguments regarding intervening causes
and qualified immunity.
(5)
All briefs shall be double spaced and in at least 14 point
font.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?