Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County et al

Filing 62

ORDER denying 58 Motion to Enforce Protective Order and to Bar Kate Dreher from Bringing a Bodyguard to Her Deposition; denying as moot 59 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/08/2014. (thh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION No: 1:13-CV-00224-MR-DSC ROBERT WILCOXSON, Plaintiff vs. BUNCOMBE COUNTY, BOBBY MEDFORD, in his individual and official capacities, SAM CONSTANCE in his individual capacity, GEORGE SPRINKLE, in his individual capacity, MICHAEL MURPHY, in his individual capacity, JOHN ELKINS, in his individual capacity, UNKNOWN JOHN DOE INVESTIGATORS, in their individual capacities, and UNKNOWN RICHARD ROE SUPERVISORS AND POLICYMAKERS, in their individual, official and policymaking capacities, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Defendants. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce Protective Order and to Bar Kate Dreher from Bringing a Bodyguard to Her Deposition” (document #58) and the “Motion for Stay on Behalf of ADA Dreher” (document #59). The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions. For the reasons stated in the “Response to Motion to Bar ADA Dreher from Bringing SBI Agent to Deposition” (document #60), Plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce Protective Order and to Bar Kate Dreher from Bringing a Bodyguard to Her Deposition” (document #58) is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to SEAL the “Response to Motion to Bar ADA Dreher from Bringing SBI Agent to Deposition” (document #60) and the attachments thereto. The “Motion for Stay on Behalf of ADA Dreher” (document #59) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order to the parties’ counsel and to the Honorable Martin Reidinger. SO ORDERED. Signed: December 8, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?