Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County et al
Filing
62
ORDER denying 58 Motion to Enforce Protective Order and to Bar Kate Dreher from Bringing a Bodyguard to Her Deposition; denying as moot 59 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 12/08/2014. (thh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
No: 1:13-CV-00224-MR-DSC
ROBERT WILCOXSON,
Plaintiff
vs.
BUNCOMBE COUNTY, BOBBY MEDFORD, in his
individual and official capacities, SAM CONSTANCE in his
individual capacity, GEORGE SPRINKLE, in his individual
capacity, MICHAEL MURPHY, in his individual capacity,
JOHN ELKINS, in his individual capacity, UNKNOWN
JOHN DOE INVESTIGATORS, in their individual
capacities, and UNKNOWN RICHARD ROE
SUPERVISORS AND POLICYMAKERS, in their
individual, official and policymaking capacities,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Defendants.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce Protective Order
and to Bar Kate Dreher from Bringing a Bodyguard to Her Deposition” (document #58) and the
“Motion for Stay on Behalf of ADA Dreher” (document #59).
The Court has carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions. For the reasons stated in
the
“Response to Motion to Bar ADA Dreher from Bringing SBI Agent to Deposition” (document
#60), Plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce Protective Order and to Bar Kate Dreher from Bringing a
Bodyguard to Her Deposition” (document #58) is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to SEAL the “Response to Motion to Bar ADA Dreher from
Bringing SBI Agent to Deposition” (document #60) and the attachments thereto.
The “Motion for Stay on Behalf of ADA Dreher” (document #59) is DENIED AS
MOOT.
The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order to the parties’ counsel and to the
Honorable Martin Reidinger.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 8, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?