Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County et al
Filing
80
ORDER granting 75 Renewed Motion to Amend Complaint, and Pltf. shall file his Amended Complaint within 10 days of this Order; granting 73 Motion for Extension of Time for Serving Summons on Unknown John Doe Investigator Roney Hilliard, and Pltf. shall serve his amended complaint on Roney Hilliard within 10 days of filing of his amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 2/20/15. (ejb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
No: 1:13-CV-00224-MR-DSC
ROBERT WILCOXSON,
Plaintiff
vs.
BUNCOMBE COUNTY, BOBBY MEDFORD, in his
individual and official capacities, SAM CONSTANCE in his
individual capacity, GEORGE SPRINKLE, in his individual
capacity, MICHAEL MURPHY, in his individual capacity,
JOHN ELKINS, in his individual capacity, UNKNOWN
JOHN DOE INVESTIGATORS, in their individual
capacities, and UNKNOWN RICHARD ROE
SUPERVISORS AND POLICYMAKERS, in their
individual, official and policymaking capacities,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Defendants.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Renewed Motion to Amend
Complaint” (document #75) and “Motion for Extension of Time for Serving Summons on
Unknown John Doe Investigator Roney Hilliard” (document #73), as well as the parties’ briefs
and exhibits. For the reasons stated in his briefs, Plaintiff’s Motions are granted.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s “Renewed Motion to Amend Complaint” (document #75) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint within ten days of this Order.
2. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Extension of Time for Serving Summons on Unknown John
Doe Investigator Roney Hilliard” (document #73) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall serve his
amended complaint on Roney Hilliard within ten days of filing his amended complaint.
3. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order to the parties’ counsel and
to the Honorable Martin Reidinger.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: February 20, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?