McEntyre v. Greene et al

Filing 37

ORDER striking document entitled 36 Discovery Plan. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/10/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (nv)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:13 CV 238

TERRY LEE McENTYRE,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff
v
DUDLEY GREENE and JAMES A.
MANIE,
Defendants

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the undersigned pursuant to a document filed by
the Plaintiff entitled “Discovery Plan” (#36). Although the Plaintiff does not cite
any rule of civil procedure or any local rule, it appears that the Plaintiff may be
attempting to present a plan for discovery as provided by Rule 26(f) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure. The filing of this document at this time is unnecessary.
The undersigned has already directed the parties to provide a Certification of Initial
Attorney’s Conference and Discovery Plan and further, held a conference with the
parties in regard to their respective plans on September 5, 2014. As a result of that
conference the undersigned has entered a Pretrial Order and Case Management
Plan (#35). A reading of the “Discovery Plan” (#36) shows that it does not comply
with Rule 26(f)(3) and the document should be stricken from the file in this matter.
1

ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the document entitled “Discovery
Plan” (#36) is ordered to be STRICKEN from the file in this matter.

Signed: November 10, 2014

2