Trent v. Roberts et al

Filing 14

ORDER denying as moot Pltf's 12 Motion moving the Court to state why there has been no ruling on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/14/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:13cv275 JERRY JUSTIN TRENT, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD B. ROBERTS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, moves this Court to “state why there has been no ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss and when that ruling will be issued.” Aside from the fact that Plaintiff may not make such demands of this Court, the Plaintiff’s motion is moot as the Court issued a Memorandum and Recommendation on the Motion to Dismiss on May 12, 2014. Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot the motion [# 12]. Signed: May 14, 2014

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?