Trent v. Roberts et al
Filing
14
ORDER denying as moot Pltf's 12 Motion moving the Court to state why there has been no ruling on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/14/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(ejb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:13cv275
JERRY JUSTIN TRENT,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICHARD B. ROBERTS, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, moves this Court to “state why there has
been no ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss and when that ruling will be
issued.” Aside from the fact that Plaintiff may not make such demands of this
Court, the Plaintiff’s motion is moot as the Court issued a Memorandum and
Recommendation on the Motion to Dismiss on May 12, 2014. Accordingly, the
Court DENIES as moot the motion [# 12].
Signed: May 14, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?