T.A. v. Burke County Public Schools Board of Education et al
Filing
24
ORDER denying the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment and 23 Motion to Seal without prejudice due to failure to comply with Local Rules and requirements of this Court. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 09/23/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (klb)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00278-MR-DLH
T.A., as Lawful Guardian Ad Litem of )
Minor Child, H.S.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BURKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS )
BOARD OF EDUCATION, LINDA
)
BRADSHAW, JOHN ROES 1-10, and )
MICHAEL ALEXANDER,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion for Summary
Judgment [Doc. 21] and Motion to Seal [Doc. 23] filed by the Defendants
Burke County Public Schools Board of Education and Linda Bradshaw.
The Defendants’ Motions fail to comply with the requirement set forth
in the Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan which requires that
motions and briefs be in at least 14 point type.
[Doc. 8 at 5].
The
Defendants also failed to include a supporting brief with their Motion to
Seal, in violation of Local Civil Rule 7.1(C). Additionally, the Defendants
have failed to include: (1) a statement as to why there are no alternatives to
filing under seal; (2) a statement as to the period of time the party seeks to
have the material maintained under seal and as to how the matter is to be
handled upon unsealing; and (3) any supporting statutes, case law or other
authority. See LCvR 6.1(C). Further, the Defendants have not submitted
the documents that they seek to have filed under seal to the Court, either
for in camera review or under seal as part of the record. See LCvR 6.1(D).
For all of these reasons, the Defendants’ Motions are denied without
prejudice.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion for Summary
Judgment [Doc. 21] and Motion to Seal [Doc. 23] filed by the Defendants
Burke County Public Schools Board of Education and Linda Bradshaw are
DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to their failure to comply with the
Local Rules and the requirements of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: September 23, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?