Jones v. Hill et al
ORDER denying re 144 Response in Opposition construed as a motion for reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/06/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00328-MR-DSC
JUANITA L. JONES a/k/a
JUANITA L. OWENS,
J. CALVIN HILL, et al.,
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s “Opposition to
Dismiss Lawsuit for Conspiracy and Deprivation of Rights under Color of
Law” [Doc. 144], which the Court takes to be intended as a motion for
Upon careful review and consideration, and for the reasons
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s
“Opposition” [Doc. 144], which the Court construes as a motion for
reconsideration, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?