Arthur v. USA

Filing 17

ORDER that USM shall make arrangements to have Petitioner Jeffrey Alan Arthur transported from his place of incarceration to this District, ensuring that Petitioner arrives in this District prior to the commencement of the Jun e 2015 sentencing term in order that he may be afforded adequate opportunity to confer with counsel in preparation for the hearing. FURTHER ORDERED that USPO shall prepare a supplemental Presentence Report in advance of sentencing hearing. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/17/15. (ejb)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00014-MR (CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:09-cr-00051-MR-1) JEFFREY ALAN ARTHUR, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as amended [Docs. 1, 5]. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this matter is hereby scheduled for hearing at the United States Courthouse in Asheville, North Carolina, during this Court’s June 2015 sentencing term. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make arrangements to have the Petitioner transported from his place of incarceration to this District. The United States Marshal shall ensure that the Petitioner arrives in this District prior to the commencement of the June 2015 sentencing term in order that he may be afforded adequate opportunity to confer with counsel in preparation for the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Probation Office shall prepare a supplemental Presentence Report in advance of the sentencing hearing. The Clerk of Court is directed to certify copies of this Order to the United States Bureau of Prisons, the United States Marshals Service, and the United States Probation Office. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: April 17, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?