Holmes v. Moore et al

Filing 6

ORDER denying 5 Motion Writ of Certiorari Coram Nobis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff is hereby advised of his right to appeal this Order to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit within 30 days from the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 04/26/2014. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(thh)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00084-MR-DLH
EUGENE “SHERLOCK” HOLMES,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TIM MOORE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff’s “Writ of
Certiorari Coram Nobis Fed. R. Civil P. 60-B.” [Doc. 5].
Mindful that pro se pleadings should be construed liberally, Erickson
v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007), the Court shall treat the Plaintiff’s
present filing as a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure. Upon review of the motion, the Court concludes that the
Plaintiff is not entitled to relief pursuant to Rule 60.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the pro se Plaintiff’s “Writ of
Certiorari Coram Nobis Fed. R. Civil P. 60-B” [Doc. 5], which is construed
as a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff is hereby advised of his
right to appeal this Order to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
within thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed: April 26, 2014

2