Peyton et al v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.

Filing 7

ORDER: W/in 14 days, Pltfs shall file an appropriate motion or take further action. Failure to take further action against the Dft will result in dismissal. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 09/26/2014. (klb)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00148-MR-DLH RONALD PEYTON and REED SHIPMAN, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) ) CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On June 11, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed this action against the Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. [Doc. 1]. The Plaintiffs served the Defendant with the Complaint and Summons in this case on June 24, 2014. [See Doc. 6]. On July 16, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed a motion on behalf of the Defendant, seeking to extend the time for the Defendant to answer or otherwise plead to the Complaint. [Doc. 4]. That motion was granted, and the Defendant’s deadline for responding to the Complaint was extended to July 30, 2014. [Doc. 5]. To date, however, the Defendant has not made an appearance or otherwise defended this action, and the Plaintiffs appear to have made no effort to prosecute the action further against the Defendant. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, the Plaintiffs shall file an appropriate motion or otherwise take further action with respect to the Defendant. The Plaintiffs are advised that failure to take further action against the Defendant will result in the dismissal of this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: September 26, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?