Blakley v. Bates et al

Filing 66

ORDER that the Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of Time 65 is GRANTED. The Plaintiff shall have through and including August 26, 2016, within which to file a Response to the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 08/19/16. (emw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:14-cv-165 DEMARCUS BLAKLEY Plaintiff, vs. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BATES et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time [Doc. 65]. The Defendants consent to the Motion. For the reasons stated in the motion, and for cause shown, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for an Extension of Time [Doc. 65] is GRANTED. The Plaintiff shall have through and including August 26, 2016, within which to file a Response to the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: August 19, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?