Kagonyera v. Buncombe County et al

Filing 26

CONSENT ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY re 25 Order on Consent Motion Concerning Discoery. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 11/12/14. (emw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:14-CV-251 KENNETH KAGONYERA Plaintiff, v. BUNCOMBE COUNTY, BOBBY LEE MEDFORD, individually and officially, SAMUEL MATTHEW CONSTANCE, individually and officially, GEORGE SPRINKLE, individually and officially, MICHAEL MURPHY, individually and officially, and JOHN ELKINS, individually and officially, CONSENT ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY Defendants. Pending before the Court is the Consent Motion Concerning Discovery. Upon a review of the record and the parties’ motion, the Court GRANTS the motion and enters this Order negotiated and agreed to by Buncombe County, Bobby Medford, Samuel Matthew Constance, George Sprinkle, Michael Murphy, and John Elkins (hereinafter “the Defendants”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, Kenneth Kagonyera (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and Robert Wilcoxson (hereinafter “Wilcoxson”), by and through his undersigned counsel. 1. Except as may be otherwise provided by further order of this Court, the abovenamed parties in this matter and the related matter captioned Wilcoxson v. Buncombe County, 1:13-cv-00224-MR-DSC shall be permitted to rely upon and share discovery materials produced in the two related lawsuits. To the extent that protective orders control the handling of any such materials, all terms and conditions of said orders shall apply to the parties identified herein. 2. All parties covered by this order reserve the right to object to disclosure to a requesting party. 3. All parties identified herein may seek modification or termination of this order by written motion. SO ORDERED. Signed: November 12, 2014 CONSENTED TO: /s/ Jacob H. Sussman Jacob H. Sussman, NCSB # 31821 S. Luke Largess, NCSB # 17486 Noell P. Tin, NCSB # 20603 TIN FULTON WALKER & OWEN, PLLC 301 East Park Avenue Charlotte, NC 28203 T: 704-338-1220 F: 704-338-1312 E: jsussman@tinfulton.com E: llargess@tinfulton.com E: ntin@tinfulton.com Counsel for Plaintiff Kenneth Kagonyera /s/ Curtis W. Euler Curtis W. Euler, NCSB # 22043 BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY 200 College Street, Suite 400 Asheville, NC 28801 T: 828-250-4112 F: 828-250-6005 E: Curt.Euler@buncombecounty.org Counsel for Defendant Buncombe County /s/ Ervin L. Ball, Jr. Ervin L. Ball, Jr., NCSB # 185 BALL, BARDEN & CURY, PA P.O. Box 7157 Asheville, NC 28802 T: 828-252-0682 F: 828-252-6774 eball@ballnclaw.com Counsel for Defendant George Sprinkle /s/ Sean Perrin Sean Perrin, NCSB # 22253 WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE 301 S. College Street, Suite 3500 Charlotte, NC 28202 T: 704-331-4992 F: 704-338-7814 E: sperrin@wcsr.com Counsel for Defendant Bobby Medford, in his Official Capacity /s/ Patrick Flanagan Patrick Flanagan, NCSB # 17407 CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG 2907 Providence Rd, Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28211 T: 704-940-3419 F: 704-831-5522 E: phf@cshlaw.com Counsel for Def. Bobby Medford, in his Individual Capacity /s/ Thomas J. Doughton Thomas J. Doughton, NCSB # 16611 DOUGHTON RICH BLANCATO 633 West Fourth Street, Suite 150 Winston-Salem, NC 27101 T: 336-725-9416 E: td@drbattorneys.com Counsel for Defendant Michael Murphy /s/ Joseph P. McGuire Joseph P. McGuire, NCSB # 6739 MCGUIRE, WOODS & BISSETTE 48 Patton Building, Drhumor Building Asheville, NC 28801 T: 828-254-8800 F: 828-252-2438 E: jmcguire@mwbavl.com Counsel for Defendants Samuel Constance and John Elkins /s/ David S. Rudolf David S. Rudolf, NCSB # 8587 Christopher C. Fialko, NCSB # 19010 RUDOLF WIDENHOUSE & FIALKO 225 East Worthington Avenue, Suite 200 Charlotte, NC 28203 T: 704-333-9945 F: 704-335-0224 E: dsrudolf@rwf-law.com Counsel for Robert Wilcoxson in Case No. 1:13-cv-224

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?