Millsaps v. White et al
Filing
13
ORDER granting 10 MOTION to Dismiss and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/14/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:14-cv-271-FDW
MARVIN W. MILLSAPS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SUSAN WHITE, et al.,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dismiss,” (Doc.
No. 10), which the Court construes as a motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Under Rule 41, Plaintiff could have filed a notice of dismissal without a court order. See
FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (stating that the plaintiff may take a voluntary dismissal without a
court order “before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary
judgment”). In any event, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss. To the extent that
Plaintiff seeks to have this Court to withdraw the Order of the Court requiring partial payment
from Plaintiff’s trust account the Court will not withdraw the Order, as Plaintiff is still required
to pay the full filing fee even though he is taking a voluntary dismissal of this action. See
McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607 (6th Cir. 1997) (“Even a voluntary dismissal of a
complaint or an appeal does not eliminate a prisoner’s obligation to pay the required filing
fees.”); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (stating that “if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an
appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee”).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 10), is GRANTED, and this action is
dismissed without prejudice.
2.
The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action.
Signed: November 14, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?