Millsaps v. White et al

Filing 13

ORDER granting 10 MOTION to Dismiss and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/14/14. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(emw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:14-cv-271-FDW MARVIN W. MILLSAPS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SUSAN WHITE, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dismiss,” (Doc. No. 10), which the Court construes as a motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under Rule 41, Plaintiff could have filed a notice of dismissal without a court order. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (stating that the plaintiff may take a voluntary dismissal without a court order “before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment”). In any event, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks to have this Court to withdraw the Order of the Court requiring partial payment from Plaintiff’s trust account the Court will not withdraw the Order, as Plaintiff is still required to pay the full filing fee even though he is taking a voluntary dismissal of this action. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 607 (6th Cir. 1997) (“Even a voluntary dismissal of a complaint or an appeal does not eliminate a prisoner’s obligation to pay the required filing fees.”); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (stating that “if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee”). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 10), is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed without prejudice. 2. The Clerk is instructed to terminate this action. Signed: November 14, 2014 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?