Foster v. Fisher et al
Filing
26
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Pro Se Access to Electronic Filing. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/11/15. (khm)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:14-cv-00292-MR-DSC
JENNIFER NICOLE FOSTER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
AMANDA FISHER, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for
Reconsideration of Order Denying Pro Se Access to Electronic Filing [Doc.
21].
The Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court’s Order denying her
access to electronic filing. Electronic filing is available only to attorneys
who have been admitted to the Bar of this Court. Attorneys are required to
take a course before utilizing the ECF system.
These restrictions are
necessary to ensure that the system is used in an appropriate manner.
While the Court understands that the costs incurred in manual filing may be
burdensome considering the Plaintiff’s limited financial resources, such
expenses are “simply unavoidable.” Reid v. State of North Carolina, No.
3:09-cv-541-RJC-DCK, 2010 WL 890263, at *5 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2010)
aff’d sub nom. Reid v. North Carolina, 382 F. App’x 258 (4th Cir. 2010).
IT
IS,
THEREFORE,
ORDERED
that
the
Plaintiff’s
Motion
for
Reconsideration of Order Denying Pro Se Access to Electronic Filing [Doc.
21] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?