Herren v. Colvin
Filing
24
ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr. on 9/26/2018. (ejb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 1:15-cv-00002-MOC
STEPHANIE I. HERREN,
Plaintiff,
Vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion for Fees under 42 U.S.C. §
406(b). The Acting Commissioner has filed a Response, in which she takes no position on the
award of the fee.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), whenever the court renders a judgment favorable to a
claimant, it may award attorney fees not to exceed 25% of past-due benefits. In the instant case,
the fee agreement between the plaintiff and counsel provides for a contingency fee of 25% of pastdue benefits. In these circumstances, the reviewing court does not calculate a lodestar amount; it
simply reviews the fee claimed for reasonableness. See Mudd v. Barnhardt, 418 F.3d 424, 427-28
(4th Cir. 2005).
The Court has reviewed the amount requested by counsel in light of the pleadings and finds
it to be reasonable. Plaintiff was awarded $71,361.00 in past-due benefits at the administrative
level after this Court entered judgment. In light of the results achieved before this Court and upon
1
remand, the sum of $11,840.25 is a reasonable attorney’s fee as no factors under Gisbrecht v.
Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002) counsel reduction of the fee award. .
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Motion for Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (#20)
is GRANTED, and the Social Security Administration shall release the sum of $11,840.25 to
plaintiff’s counsel as attorney’s fees for services rendered before this court. Plaintiff’s counsel
shall refund to the Plaintiff the amount of $5,000.00 previously awarded and paid to plaintiff’s
counsel pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Signed: September 26, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?