Plaintiff v. State of North Carolina et al

Filing 46

ORDER granting Pltf's 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Due to Medical Reasons, and Pltf' shall file his Second Amended Complaint on or before 6/4/2015; denying as moot Pltf's 42 Motion for Dismissal and Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Robyn S. Morris. Signed by Magistrate Judge David S. Cayer on 6/1/15. (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-00044-MR-DSC TODD W. SHORT, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, et. al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Dismissal and Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Robyn S. Morris…” (document # 42) filed May 29, 2015 and “Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Due to Medical Reasons” (document #44) filed June 1, 2015. The Court will grant Plaintiff’s Motion for an extension of time to file his Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall have up to and including June 4, 2015 to file his Second Amended Complaint. Since Plaintiff may amend his Complaint and has not served any of the Defendants, the Court will deny as moot his Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may address the subject of that Motion in his Second Amended Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 1. “Plaintiff’s “Motion for Extension of Time to Amend Due to Medical Reasons” (document #44) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaint on or before June 4, 2015. 2. Plaintiff’s “Motion for Dismissal and Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Robyn S. Morris…” (document # 42) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to pro se Plaintiff; and to the Honorable Martin Reidinger. SO ORDERED. Signed: June 1, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?