Parham v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment and allow an extension of time to file an appropriate motion and supporting memorandum that comply with the Court's "Social Security Briefing Order" is affirmed. It is therefore ordered that the 16 Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby affirmed. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/30/2015. (nv)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:15CV63
TIMOTHY JAMES PARHAM,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Vs.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_______________________________)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the Memorandum and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed September
10, 2015. The parties were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and
Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, written objections to the
Memorandum and Recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of
the same. No objections have been filed.
After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate’s memorandum,
the court concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and the
recommendation to deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment and allow an extension of time to file an appropriate motion and
supporting memorandum that comply with the Court’s “Social Security Briefing
Order” is affirmed.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Memorandum and
Recommendation is hereby AFFIRMED.
Signed: September 30, 2015