Pickens v. Lewis et al

Filing 97

AMENDED ORDER granting Pltf's 93 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response re: 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and Pltf shall have sixty days from service of this order to file his response. To this extent, Court's prior 95 Order dated 11/17/2017, is hereby amended. No further extensions of time will be granted. ( Responses due by 1/22/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/20/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:15-cv-275-FDW BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ROBERT LEWIS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) AMENDED ORDER UPON MOTION of Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 93), for an enlargement of time within which to file a responsive pleading to the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Beddingfield, Lancaster, Lewis, White, and Yearick, and for good cause shown, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have sixty days from service of this order in which to file his response. (Doc. No. 93). To this extent, the Court’s prior order dated November 17, 2017, (Doc. No. 95), is hereby amended. No further extensions of time will be granted. Signed: November 20, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?