Pickens v. Lewis et al
Filing
97
AMENDED ORDER granting Pltf's 93 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response re: 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and Pltf shall have sixty days from service of this order to file his response. To this extent, Court's prior 95 Order dated 11/17/2017, is hereby amended. No further extensions of time will be granted. ( Responses due by 1/22/2018 plus an additional 3 days if served by mail). Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/20/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:15-cv-275-FDW
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ROBERT LEWIS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
AMENDED ORDER
UPON MOTION of Plaintiff, (Doc. No. 93), for an enlargement of time within which to
file a responsive pleading to the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Beddingfield,
Lancaster, Lewis, White, and Yearick, and for good cause shown,
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have sixty days from service of this
order in which to file his response. (Doc. No. 93). To this extent, the Court’s prior order dated
November 17, 2017, (Doc. No. 95), is hereby amended.
No further extensions of time will be granted.
Signed: November 20, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?