The Biltmore Company v. NU U, Inc. et al
Filing
33
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER re 31 Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Protective Order. See Order for further details. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/22/2016. (kby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:15-cv-00288-MR
THE BILTMORE COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NU U, INC.; TOP 10 PROM, LLC
)
d/b/a Merle Norman of Asheville,
)
NC and Top 10 Prom; and top10,
)
LLC d/b/a Merle Norman of
)
Asheville, NC and Top 10 Prom,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________ )
CONSENT PROTECTIVE
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Entry
of Consent Protective Order. [Doc. 31].
Upon reviewing the parties' Motion, it appears that discovery and the
trial in this action may involve the production and disclosure of confidential,
proprietary, or sensitive information that requires protection against
unrestricted disclosure or use. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED,
and ORDERED that the following confidentiality provisions will govern all
information and documents disclosed through discovery in this action:
1.
Certain information and documents to be produced by Plaintiff and
Defendant during discovery in this litigation may contain trade secrets or
other proprietary, confidential research, development, or commercial
information that should be considered confidential and protected from
unreasonable disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(c).
2.
Information and documents to be considered confidential and
disclosed only in accordance with the terms of this Consent Protective Order
(the “Order”) includes, without limitation, all documents or information,
whether in hard copy or electronic form, designated in accordance with the
terms of this Order and supplied in response to the demands or requests of
either party, formal or informal, regardless of whether such information is
produced or disclosed by a party, an affiliated person or entity, or a formerly
affiliated person or entity.
3.
All
information
designated
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” in accordance with the terms
of this Order and disclosed in discovery in this action must be used solely for
the purposes of prosecuting or defending this litigation and must not be used
for any other purpose.
4.
“Discovery Material” means and includes any document (whether in
hard copy or electronic form), thing, deposition testimony, interrogatory
2
answer, response to requests for admissions and/or production, or other
information provided in discovery in this action. Any party may, in good faith,
designate
Discovery
Material
as
“CONFIDENTIAL”
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
or
“HIGHLY
Discovery Material
designated “CONFIDENTIAL” must contain personal or business-related
proprietary information.
Certain limited types of “CONFIDENTIAL”
information may be alternatively designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’
EYES
ONLY.”
The
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
-
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” designation is reserved for confidential
information that constitutes, reflects, or concerns trade secrets, know-how or
proprietary data, business, financial, or commercial information, the
disclosure of which is likely to cause harm to the competitive position of the
party making the confidential designations of Discovery Material.
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” information, as used in this Order, refers to any information so
designated.
5.
All information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” must be maintained in
confidence by the parties to whom such information is produced or given,
must be used solely for the purposes of this litigation, and cannot be
disclosed to any person or entity except:
3
(a)
The Court (including court reporters, stenographic reporters and
videographers, and court personnel);
(b)
Subject to the terms of Paragraph 14 below, the attorneys of
record, their partners, employees, contractors, and associates of outside
counsel (collectively hereafter referred to as “Outside Counsel”);
(c)
Officers or employees of Plaintiff in this action, and officers and
employees of Defendant in this action; provided, that such officers or
employees receive such “CONFIDENTIAL” information solely on a “need to
know” basis for the purposes of prosecuting or defending this litigation and
for no other purposes. All CONFIDENTIAL information provided to officers
and employees must be returned or destroyed by such officers and
employees upon resolution of this action;
(d)
Subject to the terms of Paragraph 14 below, experts and their
staff and litigation support personnel and their staff retained by Outside
Counsel in this litigation; and
(e)
Any other person approved by the producing party in writing prior
to such disclosure.
6.
All
information
designated
as
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
-
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” must be maintained in confidence for use by
the attorneys of the parties, can only be used for the purposes of this
4
litigation, and cannot be disclosed to any person except those listed in
subparagraphs (a), (b), and (e) of paragraph 5 above.
7.
Nothing in the Order will be taken as assent by a non-producing party
that designated information is in fact “CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or is entitled to protection
under Rule 26(c). If counsel for the non-producing party believes that a
confidentiality designation is inappropriate or unjustified, counsel for the
nonproducing party will notify counsel for the producing party of its belief that
the information should not be so designated or should be disclosed to
persons other than those allowed by this Order. A party is not obligated to
challenge the propriety of a designation at the time of production and failure
to do so will not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. Such challenges
must be made in writing, served on counsel for the producing party, and
identify with particularity the documents or information with which the nonproducing party objects to designation. The parties must use their best efforts
to promptly and informally resolve such disputes. If the parties do not reach
agreement on the correct designation for the information within twenty (20)
business days of service of the non-producing party's challenge, the nonproducing party may file a motion with the Court setting forth the nonproducing party’s reasons for why the designation should be changed.
5
Unless and until the Court issues a ruling that the information may be
disclosed to persons other than those authorized by this Order, the contested
designation will remain in place and treated consistently with the terms of
this Order.
8.
Information that is presumptively HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
-
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY includes: information concerning previously
nonpublicly known future product designs, current and future business plans,
unpublished and pending patent applications; the identities and addresses
of a company’s current or former customers; and other HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY commercial information.
9.
Nothing in this Order precludes any party from applying to this Court
for relief from any provision hereof, or from asserting that certain discovery
materials should receive greater confidentiality protection than provided
herein, in accordance with Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
10.
The designation of documents as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” will not be effective unless a
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” notice or the equivalent is placed or affixed on such document. Where
practicable, such notice must be placed near the document's Bates number.
In the case of computer, audiovisual, or other electronic or magnetic medium,
6
such notice must be placed on the medium and its protective cover, if any.
Testimony given at a deposition or hearing may be designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 15 of this Order. Any
designation that is inadvertently omitted from a document or testimony may
be corrected by written notification to opposing counsel, but any disclosure
of the non-designated document prior to such notification is not a violation of
this Order.
11.
All “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY” information must be maintained under the control of Outside
Counsel, who are responsible for preventing any disclosure thereof except
in accordance with the terms of this Order.
12.
Before
filing
any
information
that
has
been
designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” with the Court, or any pleadings, motions or other papers that
disclose any such information, counsel must confer with counsel for the
producing party about how such information should be filed. If the producing
party desires that the materials be filed under seal, then the filing party must
file the materials under seal, with notice served upon the producing party.
The filing of the materials under seal is not binding on the Court. Within ten
7
(10) days of service of such notice, the party desiring that the materials be
maintained under seal must file a Motion to Seal with the Court along with a
supporting memorandum of law specifying the interests which would be
served by restricting public access to the information. The party that filed the
materials is not obligated to file a Motion to Seal or otherwise defend another
party’s desire that the materials remain sealed. The Court will only grant the
Motion to Seal after: providing adequate notice to the public and opportunity
for interested parties to object, carefully weighing the interests advanced by
the movant and those interests favoring public access to judicial documents
and records, and upon finding that the interests advanced by the movant
override any common law or constitutional right of public access that may
attach to the information. Documents submitted under seal in accordance
with this paragraph will remain under seal pending the Court’s ruling. If the
party desiring that the information be maintained under seal does not timely
file a Motion to Seal, then the materials will be deemed unsealed.
13.
Information produced by non-parties during the course of this action
may be designated under this Order by such non-party or by a party as
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY.” Information so designated and produced by third parties must be
treated by the parties in the same manner as if produced with such
8
designation by a party. A producing non-party has all the rights of a
producing party with respect to protection of information under the terms of
this Order. The provisions of this Order for challenging the designation by a
party are applicable to challenges to designations by non-parties.
14.
Prior
to
the
disclosure
of
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information to any third
party, including persons employed to act as outside consultants or experts,
translators, or interpreters in this action, subject to subparagraphs 14(b–e),
counsel for the party seeking disclosure must require such persons to read
this Order and execute a Nondisclosure Agreement in the form attached
hereto as Exhibit A, the original of which must be promptly provided to
opposing counsel and a copy thereof served on all other counsel. In addition,
counsel for the party seeking disclosure must comply with the following:
(a)
Ten (10) days prior to the disclosure of any "CONFIDENTIAL" or
"HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY" information to any
third party, counsel for the party seeking disclosure must, subject to
subparagraphs 14(b) – (e), provide opposing counsel and, if applicable, any
non-party from which the material originated, the name, address, and
present employer of such outside consultant or expert, translator, or
interpreter. Opposing counsel and/or such non-party will then have a period
9
of ten (10) business days after receipt of such information to challenge the
disclosure of the “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information. Such challenges must be served
in writing on the party seeking to make such disclosure.
(b)
Any challenge must be ruled on by the Court prior to the
disclosure of such “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information.
(c)
Nothing in Paragraph 14 enlarges or restricts the right of any
party to conduct discovery of any expert.
(d)
Nothing in this Order requires: i) that routine outside suppliers of
litigation support services such as photocopying, scanning, or coding
execute the attached Nondisclosure Agreement; or ii) that the opposing party
utilizing such services must disclose the identity of such service suppliers to
the opposing party or counsel.
(e)
Nothing in this Order requires that the identity of graphics
preparation and presentation consultants, witness preparation consultants,
jury consultants, or trial presentation consultants be disclosed to the
opposing party or counsel. However, any party utilizing such services is
required to have such proposed service provider conduct a conflict check
and execute the attached Nondisclosure Agreement.
10
15.
Nothing in this Order prevents or restricts any person from using or
disclosing in any manner its own “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information that it has
produced or disclosed in this litigation.
16.
Order
Nothing in this Order prevents disclosure beyond the terms of this
of
any
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
-
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information if the parties to this action and, if
applicable, the non-party from which the material originated, consent, or if
the Court, on motion filed by the party seeking to make disclosure, orders
that disclosure be made. Any party may request, after notice is given to the
opposing party and, if applicable, any non-party from which the material
originated, that the Court modify or grant relief from any provision of this
Order or to place additional restrictions on the use of any “CONFIDENTIAL”
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information.
17.
Nothing herein prohibits a party or its counsel from disclosing any
document designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” to the person the document identifies as an
author or recipient of such document or to any person that has already
viewed the document, been told of its contents, or previously had legal
access to the document or information.
11
18.
Information disclosed at a deposition may be designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” by indicating on the record at the deposition that the information is
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” and subject to the provisions of this Order. All such portions of the
transcript will be appropriately marked by the court reporter and the parties
must handle such transcripts consistently with the terms of this Order.
Testimony in a deposition may also be designated “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” by notifying the
deposing party in writing within twenty-one (21) days of the receipt of the
transcript of those pages and lines or those exhibits that are
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY.” No deposition may be read by anyone other than the deponent, the
attorneys
for
the
parties,
and
those
qualified
to
see
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” material under Paragraph 7
during the twenty-one (21) day period following a deposition unless
otherwise agreed upon among the attorneys. Upon being informed that
certain portions of a deposition disclose either “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information, each
12
party must cause each copy of the transcript in its custody or control to be
marked immediately.
19.
Violation by any person of any term of this Order or of the
Nondisclosure Agreement may be punishable through the contempt powers
of court. Any person or entity that produces “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information in response to a
discovery request or subpoena in this action is intended to be a beneficiary
of this Order and of the Nondisclosure Agreement and may pursue all
remedies available for violation thereof. No provision of this Order requires
any person or entity not a party to this action to respond to any discovery
request or subpoena, except as may otherwise be required by law. Nothing
in this Order prevents or prohibits any party or non-party from seeking such
additional or further protection as it deems necessary to protect documents
or information subject to discovery in this action.
20.
Nothing herein and no action taken under this Order will constitute a
waiver or admission that any specific document, material, testimony, or thing:
(1) is relevant and subject to discovery; (2) is or is not a trade secret or
confidential proprietary information; (3) constitutes or does not constitute
confidential records; or (4) is or is not admissible in evidence at trial or at any
13
hearing. The production of any documents or information that the producing
party claims to be privileged will be governed by the facts and applicable law.
21.
Upon the final termination of this litigation, including any appeals, the
parties have sixty (60) days within which they may petition the Clerk of Court
to withdraw
all “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
-
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information or any documents and things
containing “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’
EYES ONLY” information that have been electronically filed under seal with
the Court. Any and all originals and copies of Discovery Materials designated
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” will, at the request of the producing party, be returned to the party
within sixty (60) days after a final judgment herein or settlement of this action,
or, at the option of the producing party, destroyed in that time frame, except
that Outside Counsel for each party may maintain in its files: one copy of
each pleading filed with the Court, each deposition transcript together with
the exhibits marked at the deposition, and documents constituting work
product which were internally generated based upon or that include
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES
ONLY” information. Upon receipt of any subpoena for such information, the
party receiving the subpoena must immediately notify Outside Counsel for
14
the producing party of the subpoena so that the latter may protect its
interests. In the event that documents are returned to or destroyed at the
request of the producing party, the other party or its Outside Counsel must
certify in writing that all such documents have been returned or destroyed.
The parties should agree to reasonable extensions of time to complete the
return
of
the
“CONFIDENTIAL”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
-
ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information, if necessary.
22.
The restrictions set forth in any of the preceding paragraphs of this
Order do not apply to information that:
(a)
Was, is, or becomes public knowledge not in violation of this
Order; or
(b)
Was lawfully possessed by the non-designating party prior to the
date of this Order.
23.
This Order will continue in full force and effect after the termination of
this litigation, including all appeals, and the Court will retain jurisdiction
necessary to enforce the terms of this Order. However, this Order is subject
to revocation or modification by: order of the Court, upon written stipulation
of the parties, or upon motion and reasonable notice, including opportunity
for a hearing and presentation of evidence should the Court so decide.
15
24.
The parties agree to submit this Order for entry by the Court and to be
bound by its terms prior to entry by the Court.
This the 14th day of April, 2016.
/s/ Rebecca E. Crandall
Joseph P. McGuire
N.C. State Bar No. 6739
Rebecca E. Crandall
N.C. State Bar No. 32637
McGuire, Wood & Bissette, P.A.
P.O. Box 3180
Asheville, N.C. 28802
Telephone: (828) 254-8800
jmcguire@mwbavl.com
rcrandall@mwblawyers.com
/s/ Anthony J. Biller
Anthony J. Biller
Coats & Bennett, PLLC
N.C. State Bar No. 24,117
1400 Crescent Green,
Suite 300
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Telephone: (919) 854-1844
Facsimile: (919) 854-2084
abiller@coatsandbennett.com
Wyatt S. Stevens
N.C. State Bar No. 21056
John D. Noor
N.C. State Bar No. 43102
Roberts & Stevens, P.A.
One West Pack Square, Ste. 1100
P.O. Box 7647
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Telephone: (828) 258-6992
wstevens@roberts-stevens.com
jnoor@roberts-stevens.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Attorneys for Plaintiff
OF COUNSEL:
J. Bennett Mullinax
J. Bennett Mullinax, LLC
P.O. Box 26029
Greenville, SC 29616-1029
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 22, 2016
17
EXHIBIT A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:15-cv-00288-MR
THE BILTMORE COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NU U, INC.; TOP 10 PROM, LLC
)
d/b/a Merle Norman of Asheville,
)
NC and Top 10 Prom; and top10,
)
LLC d/b/a Merle Norman of
)
Asheville, NC and Top 10 Prom,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________ )
NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT UNDER
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER
The undersigned, having read the Consent Protective Order (the
“Protective Order”) entered in the above-captioned action, understands the
terms thereof and, intending to be legally bound thereby, agrees as follows:
1.
The information or document disclosed to the undersigned pursuant to
the Protective Order must only be used in connection with the abovecaptioned action (the “Litigation”) and cannot be used for any other purpose.
18
2.
Such information and documents can only be disclosed to and
discussed with the parties' Outside Counsel or other persons authorized
pursuant to the terms of the Protective Order, who have, in accordance with
the provisions of the Protective Order, executed a similar Nondisclosure
Agreement. Such documents and information nor information acquired or
extracted from such documents or information can be divulged or made
accessible to any other person, company, firm, news organization, or any
other person or entity whatsoever, except in compliance with the Protective
Order and this Nondisclosure Agreement. This Nondisclosure Agreement
does not limit the right of the signatory to testify at trial in this action or to
prepare documents or other materials for submission at trial in this action.
3.
The undersigned agrees to take all appropriate and necessary
precautions to avoid loss or inadvertent disclosure of documents or
information covered by the Protective Order.
4.
The undersigned further agrees to return all information and
documents in his or her possession or control (including all abstracts,
summaries, descriptions, lists, synopses, pleadings, or other writings
reflecting or revealing such information) and covered by the Protective
Order, to the attorney from whom he or she received such documents and
information within thirty (30) days after the termination of this Litigation,
19
including all appeals, or within thirty (30) days after the undersigned is no
longer associated with this Litigation, whichever comes first.
5.
The undersigned acknowledges that a violation of the terms of the
Protective Order may subject the undersigned and the undersigned's
employer to sanctions, including, but not limited to, punishment for civil
contempt.
Dated:________________________________
______________________________________
Signature
______________________________________
Printed Name
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
Address
______________________________________
Employer(s)
20
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?