The Biltmore Company v. NU U, Inc. et al
Filing
51
ORDER granting 45 Defendant's Motion to Amend, and the deadline for the completion of depositions is hereby extended for a period of 30 days. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants Request for Ruling 50 is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the mediation deadline having passed, parties shall file a Mediation Report with the Court within 7 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/28/2016. (thh)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:15-cv-00288-MR
THE BILTMORE COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NU U, INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant Nu U, Inc.’s
Motion to Amend Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan to Extend
Deposition Deadline by 30 Days [Doc. 45]; the Plaintiff Response in
Opposition [Doc. 48]; and the Defendant’s Request for Ruling on
Defendant’s Motion to Amend Pretrial Order [Doc. 50].
Upon careful review of the parties’ filings, the Defendant’s motion for
an extension of time is granted, and the deadline for the completion of
depositions shall be extended for a period of thirty (30) days. This, however,
does not extent the dispositive motions deadline, there having been no
motion for such extension.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion to Amend
[Doc. 45] is GRANTED, and the deadline for the completion of depositions
is hereby extended for a period of thirty (30) days.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant’s Request for Ruling
[Doc. 50] is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the mediation deadline having
passed, parties shall file a Mediation Report with the Court within seven (7)
days of the entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: December 28, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?