Willingham v. City of Asheville NC Mayor Staffs et al
Filing
11
ORDER that Plaintiff may respond to the pending 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , on or before 9/3/2015. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response may lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 8/17/2015. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nv)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-119-MR-DCK
CHARLES DEAN WILLINGHAM,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF ASHEVILLE NC MAYOR
STAFFS, DAVID GANTT, CAROLINE
LONG, NOELE TACKETT, RHA KEY
PROGRAMS HEALTH SERV., and
AHOPE STAFF,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of
“Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)” (Document No. 10)
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison 582 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendant’s motion. The
Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendant Gantt being granted the
relief he seeks, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff may respond to the pending “Defendants
Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)” (Document No. 10) on or before
September 3, 2015. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response may lead to the dismissal of
this lawsuit.
Signed: August 17, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?