Moore v. Colvin

Filing 14

ORDER granting 13 Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys' Fees under EAJA. Signed by District Judge Robert J. Conrad, Jr on 2/14/2017. (khm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:16-cv-00071-RJC MARSHA H. MOORE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiff indicates that Defendant has consented to this Motion, and Defendant has not objected to the requested fees and the time for doing so has expired. (Id., ¶15). Having reviewed the Motion, supporting exhibits, and the case file, the Court determines that Plaintiff should be awarded attorneys’ fees under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $3,768.75. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, (Doc. No. 13), is GRANTED. The Court will award attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,768.75, and pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, that debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe any debt, the Government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees, and pay those fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed. Signed: February 14, 2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?