Greene v. Abernathy et al

Filing 7

ORDER that Pltf's 6 Motion to Dismiss will be construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal and his complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Pltf's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DISMISSED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 6/20/16. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:16-cv-00135-FDW COREY DELON GREENE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH ABERNATHY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Plaintiff’s complaint which he filed pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and his motion to dismiss his complaint. Plaintiff, who is a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, alleges that the defendants have violated his civil rights. In his motion to dismiss, Plaintiff contends that he now wishes to pursue state habeas relief before he proceeds with any § 1983 claims. The Court notes that because no answer or other pleading has been filed by any of the defendants that Plaintiff may dismiss his complaint as a matter of right. See FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a)(1)(i). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss will be construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal and his complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Doc. No. 6). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel is DISMISSED as moot. (Doc. No. 3). The Clerk is respectfully directed to close this civil case. Signed: June 20, 2016

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?