Rychenko v. Burnette et al
Filing
17
ORDER that 16 Memorandum and Recommendation is ACCEPTED; 12 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/3/2017. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(khm)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00214-MR-DSC
PYOTR MIKHAIL RYCHENKO,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MELODY BOYD BURNETTE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss [Doc. 12] and the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and
Recommendation [Doc. 16] regarding the disposition of that motion.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the standing Orders of Designation
of this Court, the Honorable David S. Cayer, United States Magistrate Judge,
was designated to consider the motion to dismiss and to submit a
recommendation for its disposition.
On January 12, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Memorandum and
Recommendation in this case containing conclusions of law in support of a
recommendation regarding the motion to dismiss. [Doc. 16]. The parties
were advised that any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum
and Recommendation were to be filed in writing within fourteen (14) days of
service. The period within which to file objections has expired, and no written
objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed.
After a careful review of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the
Court finds that the proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current
case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge’s
recommendation that the motion to dismiss should be granted.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Memorandum and
Recommendation [Doc. 16] is ACCEPTED; the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 12]
is hereby GRANTED; and this action is hereby DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 3, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?