Petty v. Byers et al

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING 14 Memorandum and Recommendations, and Defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See order for details.) FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the entry of this Order to perfect service of process as to Defendant Byers. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/3/2017. (khm)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00237-MR-DLH RICHIE PETTY, Plaintiff, vs. BILLY BYERS, in his official and individual capacity, RODNEY FITCH, in his official and individual capacity, ALAN NORMAN in his official capacity as SHERIFF OF CLEVELAND COUNTY, ASCENSION INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., as surety, and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as surety, Defendants. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8] and the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 14] regarding the disposition of that motion. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and the standing Orders of Designation of this Court, the Honorable Dennis L. Howell, United States Magistrate Judge, was designated to consider the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and to submit a recommendation for its disposition. On February 1, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Memorandum and Recommendation in this case containing conclusions of law in support of a recommendation regarding the motion to dismiss. [Doc. 14]. The parties were advised that any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation were to be filed in writing within fourteen (14) days of service. The period within which to file objections has expired, and no written objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation have been filed. After a careful review of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, the Court finds that the proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that the motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 14] is ACCEPTED, and the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8] is GRANTED as follows: (1) The Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims against Sheriff Norman and the § 1983 claims against Defendants Byers and Fitch in their official capacities are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2 (2) The Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims for excessive force asserted against Defendant Fitch in his individual capacity are DISMISSED; (3) The Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Ascension Insurance Agency, Inc. are DISMISSED; and (4) The Plaintiff’s claims arising under state law for assault and battery against Defendant Fitch are DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 8] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order to perfect service of process as to Defendant Byers. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: March 3, 2017 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?