Aryev v. Colvin
Filing
15
ORDER denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Commissioner's determination is vacated and this matter is REMADED for further consideration. The 14 Memorandum and Recommendation of the magistrate is AFFIRMED. Signed by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 9/25/2017. (kby)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:16-CV-262-GCM-DCK
MICHELLE ARYEV,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
____________________________________)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Memorandum and Recommendation of
United States Magistrate David C. Keesler, filed August 15, 2017. (Doc. No. 14). The parties
were advised that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), written objections to the Memorandum
and Recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service of the memorandum. It appears
to the Court that the parties have not filed any such objections.
After an independent and thorough review of the magistrate's memorandum, the Court
concludes that there is no clear error on the face of the record and that the recommendation to
deny Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, deny Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment, vacate the Commissioner’s determination, and remand for further
consideration is correct and in accordance with law. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins.
Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the
magistrate are accepted, Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is
DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED. The
Commissioner’s determination is vacated and this matter is hereby REMANDED for further
consideration.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation of the
magistrate is hereby AFFIRMED.
Signed: September 25, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?