Chandler v. Jordan et al

Filing 28

ORDER that to the extent the parties seek relief by depositing a "Consent Protective Order" in the Chambers mailbox, such relief is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr on 7/13/2017. (kby)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. 1:16-cv-00358-MOC-DLH
BRYAN EARL CHANDLER,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
Vs.
CON-WAY FREIGHT, INC.
DEREK MATTHEW SISE
CEVA LOGISTICS US, INC.
XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, INC.
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CORP.
MORRIS LLOYD JORDAN
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., INC
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP,
Defendants.

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on a “Consent Protective Order” dropped into
Chambers mailbox via CyberClerk. The parties are advised that in accordance with Fed. R. Civ.
P. 7 and L.Cv.R 7.1, an application to the court for any form of relief must be through a written
motion as there is no method for tracking requests other than through the Court’s docket. See also
PTO at ¶ I(F). While the Court certainly appreciates the courtesy of receiving proposed orders via
cyberclerk – and the diligent work of counsel here – any such proposal must correspond with a
filed motion. Further, CyberClerk submissions need to be directed to the judge who will actually
handle the motion, which in this case is Judge Howell, who has been referred all discovery and
pretrial issues.

-1-

ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that to the extent the parties seek relief by depositing
a “Consent Protective Order” in the Chambers mailbox, such relief is denied without prejudice.

Signed: July 13, 2017

-2-