DeBruhl v. Mission Health Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER denying Pltf's 7 "Motion for Law to Be Followed to Reinstate Case", which the Court construes as a motion for remand. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/7/17. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00405-MR-DLH

TRACEY N. DeBRUHL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
MISSION HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.,
)
MISSION HEALTH, INC., MISSION)
ST. JOSEPH’S HEALTH SYSTEM,
)
INC., MEMORIAL MISSION MEDICAL )
CENTER, INC., MEMORIAL MISSION )
MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION,
)
INC., and COPESTONE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
________________________________ )

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s “Motion for Law to
Be Followed to Reinstate Case,” which the Court construes as a motion for
remand. [Doc. 7].
The Plaintiff asks the Court to “reappoint [this case] back to Superior
[Court] or even just state it is a Superior Court Case.” [Doc. 7]. To the extent
that the Plaintiff’s request can be construed as a motion to remand, the
request must be denied. This action was originally filed in federal court and
therefore cannot be remanded to any state court. Moreover, the Plaintiff’s

federal case has been dismissed. If he wishes to pursue some remedy in
state court, he must refile an action there.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s “Motion for Law to
Be Followed to Reinstate Case” [Doc. 7], which the Court construes as a
motion for remand, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: March 7, 2017

2