Kegley v. Colvin

Filing 12

ORDER granting Deft's 11 Consent Motion to Remand, reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and remanding this case for further administrative proceedings, consistent with this Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 7/19/2017. (ejb)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00004-MR PATRICIA KEGLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ ) ORDER OF REMAND THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Remand. [Doc. 11]. Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” The Defendant here has moved for reversal of her decision and for remand of this case for further administrative proceedings. For the reasons stated in the Defendant’s motion, the Court finds that remand is appropriate. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant’s Consent Motion for Remand [Doc. 11] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby REVERSED and this case is hereby REMANDED for further administrative proceedings, consistent with this Order. The Clerk of Court shall enter a separate Judgment of Remand simultaneously herewith, thereby closing the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: July 19, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?