Michelson v. Duncan et al

Filing 117

ORDER instructing Pltf to direct his discovery requests to the appropriate party or parties in accordance with the applicable procedural rules and 46 Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan, re: Pltf's Letter docketed as a 116 Motion for Discovery. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 10/17/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:17-cv-50-FDW
CHRISTOPHER LEE MICHELSON,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
VAN DUNCAN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff’s Letter that was docketed as a
Motion for Discovery, (Doc. No. 116).
Plaintiff’s request for discovery has been misdirected to the Court. See LCvR 26.2 (“The
parties shall not file any initial disclosures, designations of expert witnesses and their reports,
discovery requests or responses thereto, deposition transcripts, or other discovery material unless:
(1) directed to do so by the Court; (2) such materials are necessary for use in an in-court
proceeding; or (3) such materials are filed in support of, or in opposition to, a motion or petition.”);
see also (Doc. No. 46) (Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is instructed to direct his discovery
requests to the appropriate party or parties in accordance with the applicable procedural rules and
Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan.
Signed: October 17, 2018

1