Spann v. NC Department of Public Safety et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting Defts Frank L. Perry, Paula Smith, Michael Slagle, Dexter Gibbs, Christopher Crawford, George Solomon, Norma Melton, and Jamie Grindstaff's 44 Corrected Motion to Compel Pltf's Initial Disclosures. (See Order for deadlines set and further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 11/16/2017. (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17 cv 104 RONALD WAYNE SPANN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT ) OF PUBLIC SAFETY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ORDER Pending before the Court is the Corrected Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Initial Disclosures [# 44]. The Court finds that Defendants Frank L. Perry, Paula Smith, Michael Slagle, Dexter Gibbs, Christopher Crawford, George Solomon, Norma Melton, and Jamie Grindstaff (Defendants) have established good cause for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. On September 19, 2017, the Court entered a Pretrial Order. In that order, initial disclosures were given the due date of October 4, 2017. On October 4, 2017, Defendants and Co-defendant Uhren all served initial disclosures on Plaintiff. Plaintiff failed to provide initial disclosures. On October 11, 2017, Defendants emailed Plaintiff regarding the initial disclosures. Plaintiff failed to provide initial disclosures. On October 16, 2017, Defendants and Co-defendant Uhren contacted Plaintiff asking for initial disclosures by October 20, 2017. On October 20, 2017, Plaintiff called Defendants and Co-defendant Uhren and stated that initial disclosures would be provided on October 23, 2017. Co-defendant Uhren sent a confirmation email. On October 23, 2017, Plaintiff failed to provide initial disclosures. On October 24, 2017, Defendants again emailed Plaintiff to try and resolve the matter. Plaintiff did not reply. On November 9, 2017, Plaintiff’s response was due for Defendants’ Corrected Motion to Compel [# 44]. Plaintiff failed to respond. Therefore, the Court GRANTS the motion [# 44] and Plaintiff must serve initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) within seven (7) days from the entry of this Order. Further, Defendants shall have fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order to serve Plaintiff with a reasonable expenses statement, including attorneys’ fees, which Defendants incurred in making this motion. If Defendants timely serve a statement, Plaintiff shall have seven (7) days from the date of service of Defendants’ statement to file either (1) a Notice indicating Plaintiff’s agreement to pay the claimed expenses; or (2) a Memorandum of no more than five pages explaining why Plaintiff contests the reasonableness of the claimed expenses along with a certification that he attempted a good faith effort to resolve any disagreement with Defendants over the claimed expenses. If Plaintiff files a Memorandum contesting 2 the claimed expenses, Defendants shall have seven (7) days to file a response of no more than five pages. Upon completion of the foregoing briefing, the Clerk may refer this matter for further action. Signed: November 16, 2017 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?