Blake v. Berryhill

Filing 20

ORDER: Plaintiff's 19 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act is DENIED without prejudice to renew. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 5/8/2018. (maf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17CV241 NICOLE LEE BLAKE, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (# 19). Plaintiff’s motion must be denied for at least two reasons. First, the motion reflects that Exhibits A and B have been attached to the motion, yet they have not. Second, a brief in support of the motion was not filed. See LCvR 7.1(c) (“A brief must be filed contemporaneously with the motion[.]”). Consequently, Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (# 19) is DENIED without prejudice to renew. Signed: May 8, 2018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?