Hurt v. Berryhill
Filing
15
ORDER that counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant shall appear before this Court at 401 W. Trade Street, Charlotte, North Carolina, on June 7, 2018, a specific courtroom and hearing time will be announced at a later date.Counsel for the parties are further directed to confer with each other by telephone on or before May 22, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/2/18. (mga) Modified text on 5/3/2018 (mga).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-248-DCK
SHERRY G. HURT,
Plaintiff,
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding scheduling concerns.
The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and
there are ripe motions for summary judgment pending before the Court.
The undersigned finds that a hearing on the pending motions may assist the Court’s prompt
disposition of this case. As such, the undersigned directs counsel for each side to appear on June
7, 2018, prepared to discuss the status of this case and to argue the merits of the pending motions.
In preparation for the hearing, counsel for the parties are further directed to confer with each other
by telephone on or before May 22, 2018, in a good faith attempt to resolve or narrow the issues in
this case.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant shall appear
before this Court at the Charles R. Jonas Federal Building, 401 W. Trade Street, Charlotte, North
Carolina, on June 7, 2018. A specific courtroom and hearing time will be announced at a later
date.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the parties shall file a Joint Notice, on or
before May 24, 2018, confirming that they have conferred regarding the issues in this case as
directed herein, and describing the results of that conference.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: May 2, 2018
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?