Buel, Inc. v. United States of America
Filing
25
ORDER denying Government's 24 Motion to Stay. Deadline for filing of any objections to the Memorandum is extended to 02/01/2019. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 01/23/2019. (ni)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:17-cv-00271-MR-WCM
BUEL, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government’s Consent
Motion for a Stay of the Deadline to Object to the Magistrate Judge’s
Memorandum and Recommendation in Light of Lapse of Appropriations
[Doc. 24].
On January 11, 2019, the Magistrate entered a Memorandum and
Recommendation (M&R) regarding the Government’s Motion to Dismiss
[Doc. 23]. The Government moves for a stay of the deadline to object to the
M&R until Congress has restored appropriations to the Department of
Justice and DOJ attorneys are permitted to resume their usual civil litigation
functions. Counsel for the Plaintiff consents to the Government’s Motion.
Upon consideration of the nature of this case, the issues presented,
and the particular stage of the proceedings, the Court will, in the exercise of
its discretion, deny the Government’s Motion. The Court will, however, allow
the parties a brief extension of time within which to file objections.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government’s Consent
Motion for a Stay of the Deadline to Object to the Magistrate Judge’s
Memorandum and Recommendation in Light of Lapse of Appropriations
[Doc. 24] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the filing of any
objections to the Memorandum Recommendation is hereby EXTENDED to
February 1, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: January 23, 2019
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?