Gervin v. Hendley et al

Filing 23

ORDER: The Clerk of Court is instructed not to issue Plaintiff's proposed subpoenas, (Doc. No. 22 ), at this time. Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 8/14/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:17-cv-306-FDW DASHAWN GERVIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CHRISTIAN HENDLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se proposed subpoenas (Doc. No. 22). Routine discovery requests should not be filed with the Court. This Court’s local rules provide that “[t]he parties shall not file any initial disclosures, designations of expert witnesses and their reports, discovery requests or responses thereto, deposition transcripts, or other discovery material unless: (1) directed to do so by the Court; (2) such materials are necessary for use in an in-court proceeding; or (3) such materials are filed in support of, or in opposition to, a motion or petition.” LCvR 26.2. Plaintiff is instructed to acquaint himself with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court’s local rules, and the blank forms available on the Court’s website. 1 See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Plaintiff is instructed to engage in voluntary discovery with Defendants and may file a motion to compel with the Court if discovery efforts fail. The Clerk of Court will be instructed not to issue Plaintiff’s proposed subpoenas at this time. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/ 1 The Clerk of Court is instructed not to issue Plaintiff’s proposed subpoenas, (Doc. No. 22), at this time. Signed: August 14, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?