Adkins v. Martin et al

Filing 34

ORDER denying Pltf's 33 "Motion of Defendant Summons". Signed by Chief Judge Frank D. Whitney on 9/18/2018. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ejb)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
1:17-cv-343-FDW
DARRYL BOYD ADKINS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
FNU MARTIN, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se “Motion of Defendant Summons”
(Doc. No. 33), in which Plaintiff appears to seek an Order from the Court requiring Defendant to
serve him with an Answer to the Complaint.
The Court has granted Defendant Martin’s Motion seeking an extension of time to file the
Answer, which is now due on October 25, 2018. See (Doc. No. 31). Plaintiff’s Motion seeking an
Order for the Defendant to serve him with a copy of the Answer will therefore be denied as
premature.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion of Defendant Summons” (Doc.
No. 33), is DENIED.
Signed: September 18, 2018

1