United States of America v. 129 Reservoir Ridge Drive, Cullowhee, NC

Filing 21

ORDER re 19 Motion to Substitute Party: Flagstar is DIRECTED to provide, within 10 days of the entry of this Order, clarification of its position regarding the loan. If Flagstar is not the owner of the loan, its respon se should include authorities to support its position that a loan servicer, and not the owner of a loan, would be the proper party to a civil forfeiture proceeding. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 5/3/2019. (Submission due by 5/16/2019.) (maf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:18 CV 117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 129 RESERVOIR RIDGE DRIVE, CULLOWHEE, NC, Real Property more particularly described in a document at Book 1898, Pages 775-777 in the office of the Register of Deeds for Jackson County, NC, ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Substitute Party by Flagstar Bank, FSB (“Flagstar”) (Doc. 19). Flagstar’s Motion states that “[t]he loan evidenced by the Note and secured by the Deed of Trust has been transferred to Flagstar.” Id. at 2. Flagstar’s supporting brief, however, provides that “[s]ervicing of the Note secured by the Deed of Trust has transferred to Flagstar.” Br. (Doc. 20) at 2. The record is therefore unclear as to whether Flagstar has obtained ownership of the debt or is servicing it on behalf of Chase, which had previously represented it was the holder and owner of the Note and Deed of Trust. Accordingly, Flagstar is DIRECTED to provide, within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, clarification of its position regarding the loan. If Flagstar is not the owner of the loan, its response should include authorities to support its position that a loan servicer, and not the owner of a loan, would be the proper party to a civil forfeiture proceeding. Signed: May 3, 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?