Whitfield v. Saul

Filing 22

ORDER granting 20 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Frank D. Whitney on 11/16/21. (clc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION KENNETH WHITFIELD, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 1:20-CV-00245 ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Consent Motion for Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) and filed on October 7, 2021. (Doc. No. 20). Having reviewed the motion and supporting memorandum, and in light of Defendant’s consent to the amount of fees, the Court grants the motion and determines that Plaintiff should be awarded an attorney’s fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $9,500.00. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED, to the extent that the Court will award attorney fees in the amount of $9,500.00, and that pursuant to Comm’r of Soc. Sec. v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, the debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, the government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees and pay the awarded fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed: November 16, 2021

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?