Robinson v. Oaks et al

Filing 119

ORDER that the 117 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Defts McAngus Goudelock and Courie, PLLC and John E. Spainhour, and the 118 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Deft David Keith Oaks are GRANTED, and the deadline for these Defts to file responses to Pltf's 109 MOTION for Sanctions is EXTENDED by 14 days, through and including 12/3/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Carleton Metcalf on 11/17/2021. (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:21-cv-00123-MR-WCM ALBERT ROBINSON ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID KEITH OAKS, ESQ., ) THE LAW FIRM OF DAVID K. OAKS, P.A., ) SECTION 23 PROPERTY OWNER'S ) ASSOCIATION, INC., ) FIVE OAKS INVESTMENTS, INC., ) THE DAVID K. OAKS PERSONAL TRUST, ) D. V. RAO, JOHN EDWARD SPAINHOUR, ) MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, PLLC, ) SECTION 23, PROPERTY OWNER'S ) ASSOCIATION, INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) ORDER This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendants McAngus Goudelock and Courie, PLLC and John E. Spainhour (Doc. 117) and a Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendant David Keith Oaks (Doc. 118). Both Motions request a fourteen (14) day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s “Motion for Sanctions Against Attorneys John Edward Spainhour, David K. Oaks, The Law Firms of McAngus, Goudelock & Couries and David K. Oaks, P.A.” (the “Motion for Sanctions,” Doc. 109). For the reasons stated therein, the Motions will be allowed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendants McAngus Goudelock and Courie, PLLC and John E. Spainhour (Doc. 117) and the Motion for Extension of Time filed by Defendant David Keith Oaks (Doc. 118) are GRANTED, and the deadline for these Defendants to file responses to Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions is EXTENDED by fourteen (14) days, through and including December 3, 2021. Signed: November 17, 2021 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?