Doe v. The University of North Carolina System et al
Filing
80
ORDER: Within 14 days of this Order, the parties shall file briefs, not to exceed 10 pages, addressing the applicability of the Wideman decision to the present action. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/10/2024. (Briefs due by 5/24/2024.) (maf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
ASHEVILLE DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 1:23-cv-00041-MR
JACOB DOE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
)
CAROLINA SYSTEM, et al.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
________________________________ )
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
In its Order granting in part and denying part the Defendants’ Motions
to Dismiss, the Court dismissed without prejudice the Plaintiff’s negligent
hiring, supervision, and retention claims on the grounds that pursuant to N.C.
Gen. Stat. § 143-291, such claims for money damages could be brought only
before the North Carolina Industrial Commission. [See Doc. 65 at 34-35].
On May 2, 2024, however, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued
a decision in Wideman v. Innovative Fibers LLC, -- F.4th –, 2024 WL
1916759 (4th Cir. May 2, 2024), in which the Court held that a similar
statutory provision, namely South Carolina’s Workers’ Compensation Law,
did not divest the federal district court of subject matter jurisdiction over the
plaintiffs’ state law claims.
In light of the Wideman decision, the Court hereby enters the following
Order.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days of this
Order, the parties shall file briefs, not to exceed ten (10) pages, addressing
the applicability of the Wideman decision to the present action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: May 10, 2024
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?