RBC Bank (USA) v. Chowdhury
Filing
15
ORDER that the Plaintiff shall have until April 13, 2012 in which to file a supplemental brief addressing the Defendant's request for entry of summary judgment in his favor. The Defendant may file a response to any supplemental briefing filed by the Plaintiff on or before April 20, 2012. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/5/12. (nll)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BRYSON CITY DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 2:11cv16
RBC BANK (USA),
Plaintiff,
vs.
JOHNNY ISLAM CHOWDHURY,
Defendant.
_____________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant’s Memorandum of
Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 11].
In his Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for
Summary Judgment, the Defendant requests that the Court enter summary
judgment in his favor as a non-moving party pursuant to Rule 56(f)(1) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 56(f)(1) provides that the Court may
enter summary judgment in favor of a non-moving party “[a]fter notice and a
reasonable time to respond.”
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have
until April 13, 2012 in which to file a supplemental brief addressing the
Defendant’s request for entry of summary judgment in his favor.
The
Defendant may file a response to any supplemental briefing filed by the
Plaintiff on or before April 20, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: April 5, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?