Garland v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Consent Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/9/13. (ejb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRYSON CITY DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 2:11cv49 LARRY DARREN GARLAND, Plaintiff, v. ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Consent Motion for Entry of Order Accepting the Parties’ Settlement Agreement on Attorney’s Fees [Doc. 17]. The parties agree that the appropriate award of attorney’s fees is the amount of Five Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($5,750.00) in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412(d). The Plaintiff has signed an Assignment of Fees in which he assigns any such award directly to counsel. [Doc. 17 at 2]. The Court finds that the Commissioner should accept the assignment of the awarded fees by the Plaintiff to his attorney and shall pay that award of fees directly to Plaintiff’s counsel; provided however, it is shown that as of the date of this Order, the Plaintiff does not owe any debt to the United States Government which is subject to offset. Astrue v. Ratliff, __U.S. __, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). In the event that the Plaintiff does, in fact, owe the United States Government any debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall pay any attorney’s fees remaining after such offset to the Plaintiff instead of to his attorney. In addition, should counsel receive an attorney’s fee award pursuant to the Social Security Act, he shall refund to the Plaintiff the smaller award. 42 U.S.C. §206(b)(2). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties’ Consent Motion for Entry of Order Accepting the Parties’ Settlement Agreement on Attorney’s Fees [Doc. 17] is hereby GRANTED and the Plaintiff is hereby awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of Five Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($5,750.00) which sum is in full satisfaction of any and all claims by the Plaintiff in this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) and subject to the limitations set forth herein. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner shall inform Plaintiff’s counsel whether the Plaintiff owes a debt to the Government by which this fee award may be offset no later than thirty (30) days from entry of this Order. Provided that the Plaintiff does not owe any debt to the United States Government which is subject to offset, the Commissioner shall honor the Assignment of fees. In the event that the Plaintiff does, however, owe the United States Government any debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall pay any attorney’s fees remaining after such offset to the Plaintiff instead of to his attorney. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2412(d) may be filed. Signed: May 9, 2013 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?