Regroup Development, LLC v. Rabun County Bank

Filing 91

JUDGMENT in favor of Rabun County Bank against Regroup Development, LLC, Regroup Sapphire 281, LLC. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 10/21/2013. (thh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BRYSON CITY DIVISION
CASE NO. 2:11cv59
REGROUP DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a
Florida Corporation, and REGROUP
SAPPHIRE 281, LLC, a Florida
Corporation,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
RABUN COUNTY BANK, a Georgia
Corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

JUDGMENT

)

THIS MATTER came to trial and was heard by the undersigned judge,
and a jury was duly empaneled and did answer the issues presented as
follows:
1.

Did the Defendant have a special relationship of trust and confidence

with the Plaintiffs?
ANSWER: NO
2.

Did the Defendant breach any such special relationship of trust and

confidence with the Plaintiffs?
ANSWER: N/A

3.

Were the Plaintiffs damaged by any fraud of the Defendant?
ANSWER: N/A

4.

Were the Plaintiffs damaged by any negligent misrepresentation of

the Defendant?
ANSWER: N/A
5.

If your answer to Issue 3 or Issue 4 or both is “Yes,” were such actions

of the Defendant in or affecting commerce?
ANSWER: N/A
6.

Was the Defendant unjustly enriched at the expense of the Plaintiffs?
ANSWER: NO

7.

Was the Defendant damaged by any fraud of the Plaintiffs?
ANSWER: N/A

8.

Did any joint venture that the Plaintiffs had with David Mahoney

terminate after May 6, 2011?
ANSWER: N/A
9.

Is the Plaintiffs’ claim barred by the “Doctrine of Unclean Hands”?
ANSWER: N/A

2

10.

What amount of damages, if any, are the Plaintiffs entitled to recover

as a direct result of the actions of the Defendant?
ANSWER: N/A
11.

What amount of punitive damages, if any, are the Plaintiffs entitled to

recover as a result of the Defendant’s actions?
ANSWER: N/A
Based upon the foregoing facts as found by the jury, the Court
concludes as a matter of law that the Plaintiffs should have and recover
nothing from the Defendant and Plaintiffs should be taxed with the costs of
this action.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant and against the
Plaintiffs and all claims asserted by the Plaintiffs against the Defendant are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and Plaintiffs shall have and recover
nothing from the Defendant in the form of damages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 21, 2013

3