Great Oak NC Lender, LLC v. Cornblum et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL without prejudice; denying as moot 30 Motion to Intervene, 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 16 Motion to Consolidate Cases, and 22 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 8/12/13. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(nll)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
BRYSON CITY DIVISION
CIVIL CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00034-MR-DLH
ASSET HOLDING COMPANY 5, LLC, )
as assignee of UNITED COMMUNITY )
MARSHALL E. CORNBLUM, et al.,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
On June 26, 2013, counsel for the Plaintiff moved to withdraw as
counsel of record in this case. [Doc. 35]. On June 28, 2013, Magistrate
Judge Dennis L. Howell granted the motion and allowed counsel to
withdraw. [Doc. 29]. In that Order, Judge Howell admonished the Plaintiff
As a corporation, Plaintiff may not appear in this
Court pro se, and the failure of Plaintiff to obtain
new counsel will result in the Court recommending
that the District Court dismiss this case.
[Doc. 29 at 1]. More than ten (10) days have passed from the entry of
Judge Howell’s Order, and Plaintiff has failed to have new counsel make an
appearance on its behalf. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this action
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this action is hereby
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following motions pending
herein are DENIED AS MOOT:
Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 15];
Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate [Doc. 16];
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended
Answer [Doc. 22]; and
Great Oak Lender, LLC’s Motion to Intervene [Doc. 30].
The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to mail a copy of this
Order to the Plaintiff Asset Holding Company 5, LLC at its last known
address: 48 Wall St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10005-2911.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: August 12, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?